Paper detail

Researh Note: Stokes-Einstein relation in simple fluids revisited

In this Research Note the Zwanzig's formulation of the Stokes-Einstein (SE) relation for simple atomistic fluids is re-examined. It is shown that the value of the coefficient in SE relation depends on the ratio of the transverse and longitudinal sound velocities. In some cases, this ratio can be directly related to the pair interaction potential operating in fluids and thus there can be a certain level of predictivity regarding the value of this coefficient. This Research Note provides some evidence in favour of this observation. In particular, analyzing the situation in several model systems such as one-component plasma, Yukawa, inverse-power-law, Lennard-Jones, and hard-sphere fluids, it is demonstrated that there are certain correlations between the interaction softness and the coefficient in SE relation. The SE coefficient is also re-evaluated for various liquid metals at the melting temperature, for which necessary data are available.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.