Paper detail

Representation Quality Of Neural Networks Links To Adversarial Attacks and Defences

Neural networks have been shown vulnerable to a variety of adversarial algorithms. A crucial step to understanding the rationale for this lack of robustness is to assess the potential of the neural networks' representation to encode the existing features. Here, we propose a method to understand the representation quality of the neural networks using a novel test based on Zero-Shot Learning, entitled Raw Zero-Shot. The principal idea is that, if an algorithm learns rich features, such features should be able to interpret "unknown" classes as an aggregate of previously learned features. This is because unknown classes usually share several regular features with recognised classes, given the features learned are general enough. We further introduce two metrics to assess these learned features to interpret unknown classes. One is based on inter-cluster validation technique (Davies-Bouldin Index), and the other is based on the distance to an approximated ground-truth. Experiments suggest that adversarial defences improve the representation of the classifiers, further suggesting that to improve the robustness of the classifiers, one has to improve the representation quality also. Experiments also reveal a strong association (a high Pearson Correlation and low p-value) between the metrics and adversarial attacks. Interestingly, the results indicate that dynamic routing networks such as CapsNet have better representation while current deeper neural networks are trading off representation quality for accuracy. Code available at http://bit.ly/RepresentationMetrics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.