Paper detail

Representation learning for maximization of MI, nonlinear ICA and nonlinear subspaces with robust density ratio estimation

Contrastive learning is a recent promising approach in unsupervised representation learning where a feature representation of data is learned by solving a pseudo classification problem from unlabelled data. However, it is not straightforward to understand what representation contrastive learning yields. In addition, contrastive learning is often based on the maximum likelihood estimation, which tends to be vulnerable to the contamination by outliers. To promote the understanding to contrastive learning, this paper first theoretically shows a connection to maximization of mutual information (MI). Our result indicates that density ratio estimation is necessary and sufficient for maximization of MI under some conditions. Thus, contrastive learning related to density ratio estimation as done in popular objective functions can be interpreted as maximizing MI. Next, with the density ratio, we establish new recovery conditions for the latent source components in nonlinear independent component analysis (ICA). In contrast with existing work, the established conditions include a novel insight for the dimensionality of data, which is clearly supported by numerical experiments. Furthermore, inspired by nonlinear ICA, we propose a novel framework to estimate a nonlinear subspace for lower-dimensional latent source components, and some theoretical conditions for the subspace estimation are established with the density ratio. Then, we propose a practical method through outlier-robust density ratio estimation, which can be seen as performing maximization of MI, nonlinear ICA or nonlinear subspace estimation. Moreover, a sample-efficient nonlinear ICA method is also proposed. We theoretically investigate outlier-robustness of the proposed methods. Finally, the usefulness of the proposed methods is numerically demonstrated in nonlinear ICA and through application to linear classification.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.