Paper detail

Reply on the Comment cond-mat/0008209 about "Solution of Classical Stochastic One-Dimensional Many-Body Systems"

In their Comment, Park, Park and Kim claimed that the approach devised in our work Phys.Rev.Lett. {\bf 83}, 5214 (1999) reproduces the correct long-time behaviour of the density and correlation functions of the model under consideration because of the {\it irrelevance} of the quartic term. Park,Park and Kim also claimed that the approach devised in Phys.Rev.Lett. {\bf 83}, 5214 (1999) is a traditional Hartree-Fock approach. In this Reply we argue that the results obtained with our approach are in agreement (also the subdominant corrections) with previous numerical calculations and are therefore beyond traditional approximative (e.g. Hartree-Fock) schemes. Such a striking agreement cannot, in our opinion, be explained only by the {\it eventual} irrelevance of a quartic term.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.