Paper detail

Replica Symmetric Bound for Restricted Isometry Constant

We develop a method for evaluating restricted isometry constants (RICs). This evaluation is reduced to the identification of the zero-points of entropy, which is defined for submatrices that are composed of columns selected from a given measurement matrix. Using the replica method developed in statistical mechanics, we assess RICs for Gaussian random matrices under the replica symmetric (RS) assumption. In order to numerically validate the adequacy of our analysis, we employ the exchange Monte Carlo (EMC) method, which has been empirically demonstrated to achieve much higher numerical accuracy than naive Monte Carlo methods. The EMC method suggests that our theoretical estimation of an RIC corresponds to an upper bound that is tighter than in preceding studies. Physical consideration indicates that our assessment of the RIC could be improved by taking into account the replica symmetry breaking.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.