Paper detail

Repair rate lower bounds for distributed storage

One of the primary objectives of a distributed storage system is to reliably store a large amount $dsize$ of source data for a long duration using a large number $N$ of unreliable storage nodes, each with capacity $nsize$. The storage overhead $β$ is the fraction of system capacity available beyond $dsize$, i.e., $β= 1- \frac{dsize}{N \cdot nsize}$. Storage nodes fail randomly over time and are replaced with initially empty nodes, and thus data is erased from the system at an average rate $erate = λ\cdot N \cdot nsize$, where $1/λ$ is the average lifetime of a node before failure. To maintain recoverability of the source data, a repairer continually reads data over a network from nodes at some average rate $rrate$, and generates and writes data to nodes based on the read data. The main result is that, for any repairer, if the source data is recoverable at each point in time then it must be the case that $rrate \ge \frac{erate}{2 \cdot β}$ asymptotically as $N$ goes to infinity and beta goes to zero. This inequality provides a fundamental lower bound on the average rate that any repairer needs to read data from the system in order to maintain recoverability of the source data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.