Paper detail

Renormalization Group Evolution of Dimension-seven Baryon- and Lepton-number-violating Operators

We study dimension-seven operators in standard model effective field theory. These operators are classified into two sets, one violating lepton number but preserving baryon number ($ΔL=\pm 2$, $ΔB=0$) and the other violating both but preserving their sum ($-ΔL=ΔB=\pm 1$). It has been found in the previous literature that there are respectively 13 and 7 such independent operators. We show that one operator is redundant in each set so that the complete list contains only 12 and 6 operators respectively. We accomplish this by using standard model equations of motion and various Fierz identities. We calculate the one-loop anomalous dimension matrix for the 6 operators in the second set, and illustrate its possible phenomenological implications by working out renormalization group running of the Wilson coefficients that could contribute to the type of proton decays with $-ΔL=ΔB=\pm 1$, such as $p\toνπ^+$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.