Paper detail

Renormalization and existence of the finite-time blow up solutions for a one-dimensional analogue of the Navier-Stokes equations

The one-dimensional quasi-geostrophic equation is the one-dimensional Fourier-space analogue of the famous Navier-Stokes equations. In their work Li and Sinai have proposed a renormalization approach to the problem of existence of finite-time blow up solutions of this equation. In this setting, existence of finite time blow ups is a consequence of existence of a fixed point for a certain renormalization operator on an appropriate functional space. They have provided a proof of existence of complex-valued finite time blow up solutions of the quasi-geostrophic equation. In this paper we revisit the renormalization problem for the quasi-geostrophic blow ups, prove existence of a family of renormalization fixed points, and deduce existence of real $C^\infty([0,T),C^\infty(\mathbb{R}) \cap L^2(\mathbb{R}))$ solutions to the quasi-geostrophic equation whose energy and enstrophy become unbounded in finite time, different from those found in the previous work of Li and Sinai.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.