Paper detail

Remove-Win: a Design Framework for Conflict-free Replicated Data Types

Distributed storage systems employ replication to improve performance and reliability. To provide low latency data access, replicas are often required to accept updates without coordination with each other, and the updates are then propagated asynchronously. This brings the critical challenge of conflict resolution among concurrent updates. Conflict-free Replicated Data Type (CRDT) is a principled approach to addressing this challenge. However, existing CRDT designs are tricky, and hard to be generalized to other data types. A design framework is in great need to guide the systematic design of new CRDTs. To address this challenge, we propose RWF -- the Remove-Win design Framework for CRDTs. RWF leverages the simple but powerful remove-win strategy to resolve conflicting updates, and provides generic design for a variety of data container types. Two exemplar implementations following RWF are given over the Redis data type store, which demonstrate the effectiveness of RWF. Performance measurements of our implementations further show the efficiency of CRDT designs following RWF.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.