Paper detail

Removal of Data Incest in Multi-agent Social Learning in Social Networks

Motivated by online reputation systems, we investigate social learning in a network where agents interact on a time dependent graph to estimate an underlying state of nature. Agents record their own private observations, then update their private beliefs about the state of nature using Bayes' rule. Based on their belief, each agent then chooses an action (rating) from a finite set and transmits this action over the social network. An important consequence of such social learning over a network is the ruinous multiple re-use of information known as data incest (or mis-information propagation). In this paper, the data incest management problem in social learning context is formulated on a directed acyclic graph. We give necessary and sufficient conditions on the graph topology of social interactions to eliminate data incest. A data incest removal algorithm is proposed such that the public belief of social learning (and hence the actions of agents) is not affected by data incest propagation. This results in an online reputation system with a higher trust rating. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the performance of the proposed optimal data incest removal algorithm.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.