Paper detail

Remarks on Strong CP-Violating Lagrangians

Owing to a different treatment of the vacuum alignment, the strong CP-violating Lagrangian obtained by Di Vecchia, Veneziano and Witten (DVW) 3 decades ago do not look quite the same as the one originally derived by Baluni at the quark or hadron level. We show that they are consistent with each other and emphasize that, within the DVW approach, the $θG\tilde G$ term is not entirely removed away after the vacuum is rotated from the CP-odd state to the CP-even one; strong CP violation resides not only in the quark mass terms but also in the residual topological sector. While the latter relies on the Dashen's theorem, the latter is based on the minimization of a potential energy with respect to the phase of the quark condensate. Contrary to some claims, it is necessary to include the SU(3)-singlet $η_0$ tadpole contribution for strong CP-odd effects induced by the Baluni-type Lagrangian to ensure that strong CP violation vanishes in the zero axial anomaly limit.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.