Paper detail

Remarks on M-theory coupling constants and M-brane tension quantizations

In the absence of a complete M-theory, we gather certain quantum aspects of this theory, namely, M-2 and M-5 brane duality and their tension quantization rule $2κ^2 T_2 T_5 = 2 πn$, the M-2 brane tension quantization $T_2 =\bigg({(2π)^2/2κ^2 m}\bigg)^{1/3}$, supersymmetry, perturbative gauge and gravitational anomaly cancellations, and the half-integral quantization of [$G^W/2π$], and study the consistency among these quantum effects. We find: (1) The complete determination of Hourava-Witten's $η= λ^6 /κ^4$ for M-theory on $R^{10} \times S^1/ Z_2$ requires not only the cancellation of M-theory gauge anomaly but also that of the gravitational anomaly, the quantization of M-2 brane tension, and the recently recognized half-integral quantization of $[G^W / 2 π]$. (2) A well-defined quantum M-theory necessarily requires the presence of both M-2 and M-5 branes and allows only $n = 1$ and $m =1$ for the respectively quantized M-2 and M-5 brane tensions. Implications of the above along with other related issues are discussed.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.