Paper detail

Relic Density of Neutralino Dark Matter in Supergravity Models

We calculate the relic density ($Ω_{χ^0_1} h^2$) of neutralino dark matter in supergravity models with radiative electroweak symmetry breaking, for values of the Higgs sector parameter $\tanβ\equiv v_2/v_1$ between the two infrared fixed points of the top quark Yukawa coupling, $\tanβ\simeq 1.8$ and $\tanβ\simeq 56$. For $\tanβ\alt 10$, the CP-odd Higgs pseudoscalar ($A^0$) and the heavier CP-even Higgs scalar ($H^0$) are much heavier than the lightest neutralino ($χ^0_1$), and the annihilation cross section of $χ^0_1$ pairs is significantly enhanced only in the vicinity of the lighter CP-even Higgs boson ($h^0$) and the $Z$ boson poles. For $\tanβ\agt 40$, $m_A$ and $m_H$ become comparable to $2m_{χ^0_1}$, and the neutralino annihilation cross section can be significantly enhanced by the poles of the $H^0$ and the $A^0$ as well. For a cosmologically interesting relic density, $0.1 \alt Ω_{χ^0_1} h^2 \alt 0.5$, we find that the supergravity parameter space is tightly constrained. The mass spectra for supersymmetric particles are presented for unification mass parameters in the cosmologically interesting region.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.