Paper detail

Reliable Categorical Variational Inference with Mixture of Discrete Normalizing Flows

Variational approximations are increasingly based on gradient-based optimization of expectations estimated by sampling. Handling discrete latent variables is then challenging because the sampling process is not differentiable. Continuous relaxations, such as the Gumbel-Softmax for categorical distribution, enable gradient-based optimization, but do not define a valid probability mass for discrete observations. In practice, selecting the amount of relaxation is difficult and one needs to optimize an objective that does not align with the desired one, causing problems especially with models having strong meaningful priors. We provide an alternative differentiable reparameterization for categorical distribution by composing it as a mixture of discrete normalizing flows. It defines a proper discrete distribution, allows directly optimizing the evidence lower bound, and is less sensitive to the hyperparameter controlling relaxation.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.