Paper detail

Reliability of MST identification in correlation-based market networks

Maximum spanning tree (MST) is a popular tool in market network analysis. Large number of publications are devoted to the MST calculation and it's interpretation for particular stock markets. However, much less attention is payed in the literature to the analysis of uncertainty of obtained results. In the present paper we suggest a general framework to measure uncertainty of MST identification. We study uncertainty in the framework of the concept of random variable network (RVN). We consider different correlation based networks in the large class of elliptical distributions. We show that true MST is the same in three networks: Pearson correlation network, Fechner correlation network, and Kendall correlation network. We argue that among different measures of uncertainty the FDR (False Discovery Rate) is the most appropriated for MST identification. We investigate FDR of Kruskal algorithm for MST identification and show that reliability of MST identification is different in these three networks. In particular, for Pearson correlation network the FDR essentially depends on distribution of stock returns. We prove that for market network with Fechner correlation the FDR is non sensitive to the assumption on stock's return distribution. Some interesting phenomena are discovered for Kendall correlation network. Our experiments show that FDR of Kruskal algorithm for MST identification in Kendall correlation network weakly depend on distribution and at the same time the value of FDR is almost the best in comparison with MST identification in other networks. These facts are important in practical applications.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.