Paper detail

Relevant-features based Auxiliary Cells for Energy Efficient Detection of Natural Errors

Deep neural networks have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance on many classification tasks. However, they have no inherent capability to recognize when their predictions are wrong. There have been several efforts in the recent past to detect natural errors but the suggested mechanisms pose additional energy requirements. To address this issue, we propose an ensemble of classifiers at hidden layers to enable energy efficient detection of natural errors. In particular, we append Relevant-features based Auxiliary Cells (RACs) which are class specific binary linear classifiers trained on relevant features. The consensus of RACs is used to detect natural errors. Based on combined confidence of RACs, classification can be terminated early, thereby resulting in energy efficient detection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our technique on various image classification datasets such as CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and Tiny-ImageNet.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.