Paper detail

Relevant change points in high dimensional time series

This paper investigates the problem of detecting relevant change points in the mean vector, say $μ_t =(μ_{1,t},\ldots ,μ_{d,t})^T$ of a high dimensional time series $(Z_t)_{t\in \mathbb{Z}}$. While the recent literature on testing for change points in this context considers hypotheses for the equality of the means $μ_h^{(1)}$ and $μ_h^{(2)}$ before and after the change points in the different components, we are interested in a null hypothesis of the form $$ H_0: |μ^{(1)}_{h} - μ^{(2)}_{h} | \leq Δ_h ~~~\mbox{ for all } ~~h=1,\ldots ,d $$ where $Δ_1, \ldots , Δ_d$ are given thresholds for which a smaller difference of the means in the $h$-th component is considered to be non-relevant. We propose a new test for this problem based on the maximum of squared and integrated CUSUM statistics and investigate its properties as the sample size $n$ and the dimension $d$ both converge to infinity. In particular, using Gaussian approximations for the maximum of a large number of dependent random variables, we show that on certain points of the boundary of the null hypothesis a standardised version of the maximum converges weakly to a Gumbel distribution.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.