Paper detail

Relaxing the Gaussian assumption in Shrinkage and SURE in high dimension

Shrinkage estimation is a fundamental tool of modern statistics, pioneered by Charles Stein upon his discovery of the famous paradox involving the multivariate Gaussian. A large portion of the subsequent literature only considers the efficiency of shrinkage, and that of an associated procedure known as Stein's Unbiased Risk Estimate, or SURE, in the Gaussian setting of that original work. We investigate what extensions to the domain of validity of shrinkage and SURE can be made away from the Gaussian through the use of tools developed in the probabilistic area now known as Stein's method. We show that shrinkage is efficient away from the Gaussian under very mild conditions on the distribution of the noise. SURE is also proved to be adaptive under similar assumptions, and in particular in a way that retains the classical asymptotics of Pinsker's theorem. Notably, shrinkage and SURE are shown to be efficient under mild distributional assumptions, and particularly for general isotropic log-concave measures.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.