Paper detail

Relativistic Split-Cavity Oscillator

Using the method of small signal analysis, we study the application potential of relativistic electron beams in split-cavity oscillators (SCO's). A beam-energy change in the SCO as a function of the initial energy of a relativistic beam is considered. It is shown that the small-signal analysis method enables adequate evaluation of SCO parameters needed for effective modulation of a relativistic beam in a split cavity and for HPM generation using SCO's. The range of energies is found for which the effect of self-modulation of the beam density in SCO structures is most pronounced. It is also shown that for beam currents at which the space charge has little effect on the motion of electrons in a beam, the beam in a split-cavity oscillator is effectively self-modulated at beam energies less than ~300-400 keV. The self-modulation drops sharply in the range of energies from 250 to 400 keV, but as the beam current is increased, the effective beam self-modulation becomes appreciable in this range too, as well as even in a higher energy range.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.