Paper detail

Relativistic effects for the superheavy reaction Og + 2Ts$_2$ -> Og(Ts)$_4$ : Dramatic relativistic effects for the atomization energy of Oganesson tetratennesside Og(Ts)$_4$ and the prediction of the existence of tetrahedral Og(Ts)$_4$

Our all-electron fully relativistic Dirac-Fock (DF) and nonrelativistic (NR) Hartree-Fock (HF) SCF molecular calculations for the superheavy tetrahedral (T$_d$) oganesson tetratennesside OgT$_4$ predict atomization energy (Ae) of 7.45 and -11.21 eV, respectively. Our DF and NR calculations, however for the square planar (D$_{4h}$)OsTs$_4$ predict atomization energy (Ae) o 6.34 and -8.56 ev, respectively. There are dramatic relativistic effects for the atomization energy of T$_d$ and D$_{4h}$ OgT$_4$ of -18.65 eV and 14.90 eV, respectively. Whereas our DF calculations predict the T$_d$OgT$_4$ to be more stable than the D$_{4h}$ OgT$_4$ by ~1.10 eV, our NR calculations predict the D$_{4h}$ OgT$_4$ to be more stable than the T$_d$ OgT$_4$ by ~2.65eV. Our NR calculations predict both the T$_d$ and D$_{4h}$ OgTs$_4$ to be unbound by 11.21 and 8.56 eV, respectively. However our relativistic DF calculations predict both the T$_d$ and D$_{4h}$ OgT$_4$ to be bound by 7.45 and 6.34 eV respectively and so the relativistic treatment is mandatory for bonding and binding in the pentatomic superheavy system with 586 electrons involving the two heaviest SHE Ts and Og.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.