Dirac-Fock-Breit-Gaunt calculations for the reaction Og + 6 CO -> Og(CO)6 or Og(OC)6
Our all electron (DFBG) calculations show differences between relativistic and non-relativistic calculations for the structure of the isomers of Og(CO)6
Discover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Walter Loveland contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
Our all electron (DFBG) calculations show differences between relativistic and non-relativistic calculations for the structure of the isomers of Og(CO)6
Our gargantuan ab initio all-electron fully relativistic Dirac-Fock (DF), nonrelativistic (NR) Hartree-Fock(HF) and Dirac-Fock-Breit-Gaunt(DFBG) molecular SCF calculations for the superheavy octahedral Oganesson hexatenniside OgTs$_6$ predict atomization energy (Ae) of 9.47, -5.54and 9.37 eV, at the optimized Os-Ts bond distances of 3.35, 3.34 and 3.36 angstroms, respectively. There are dramatic effects of relativity for the atomization energy of OgTs$_6$ (with seven superheavy elements and 820 electrons) of ~ 15.0 eV each at both the DF and DFBG levels of theory, respectively. Our calculated energy of reaction for the titled superheavy reaction Og + 3Ts$_2$ -> OgTs$_6$ at the DF, NR and DFBG levels of theory is 6.33, 8.81, and 6.26 eV, respectively. Mulliken analysis as implemented in the DIRAC code for our DF and NR calculations (using the dyall.ev4z basis) yields the charges Og(+0.60) and Og(+0.96), respectively on the central Og atom indicating that our relativistic DF calculations predict octahedral OgTs$_6$ to be less ionic. However, due caution must be used to interpret the results of Mulliken's population analysis, which is highly basis set dependent.
Our all-electron fully relativistic Dirac-Fock (DF) and nonrelativistic (NR) Hartree-Fock (HF) SCF molecular calculations for the superheavy tetrahedral (T$_d$) oganesson tetratennesside OgT$_4$ predict atomization energy (Ae) of 7.45 and -11.21 eV, respectively. Our DF and NR calculations, however for the square planar (D$_{4h}$)OsTs$_4$ predict atomization energy (Ae) o 6.34 and -8.56 ev, respectively. There are dramatic relativistic effects for the atomization energy of T$_d$ and D$_{4h}$ OgT$_4$ of -18.65 eV and 14.90 eV, respectively. Whereas our DF calculations predict the T$_d$OgT$_4$ to be more stable than the D$_{4h}$ OgT$_4$ by ~1.10 eV, our NR calculations predict the D$_{4h}$ OgT$_4$ to be more stable than the T$_d$ OgT$_4$ by ~2.65eV. Our NR calculations predict both the T$_d$ and D$_{4h}$ OgTs$_4$ to be unbound by 11.21 and 8.56 eV, respectively. However our relativistic DF calculations predict both the T$_d$ and D$_{4h}$ OgT$_4$ to be bound by 7.45 and 6.34 eV respectively and so the relativistic treatment is mandatory for bonding and binding in the pentatomic superheavy system with 586 electrons involving the two heaviest SHE Ts and Og.