Paper detail

Relative growth rate and contact Banach-Mazur distance

In this paper, we define a non-linear version of Banach-Mazur distance in the contact geometry set-up, called contact Banach-Mazur distance and denoted by $d_{\rm CBM}$. Explicitly, we consider the following two set-ups, either on a contact manifold $W \times S^1$ where $W$ is a Liouville manifold, or a closed Liouville-fillable contact manifold $M$. The inputs of $d_{\rm CBM}$ are different in these two cases. In the former case the inputs are (contact) star-shaped domains of $W \times S^1$, and in the latter case the inputs are contact 1-forms of $M$. In particular, the contact Banach-Mazur distance $d_{\rm CBM}$ defined in the former case is motivated by the concept, relative growth rate, which was originally defined and studied by Eliashberg and Polterovich. In addition, we investigate the relations of $d_{\rm CBM}$ to various numerical measurements in contact geometry and symplectic geometry, for instance, contact shape invariant, (coarse) symplectic Banach-Mazur distance. Moreover, we obtain several large-scale geometric properties in terms of $d_{\rm CBM}$. Finally, we propose a quantitative comparison between elements in the derived categories of sheaves of modules (over certain topological spaces). This is based on several important properties of the singular support of sheaves.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.