Paper detail

Relative group (co)homology theories with coefficients and the comparison homomorphism

Let $G$ be a group, let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$ and let $\Or(G)$ be the orbit category. In this paper we extend the definition of the relative group (co)homology theories of the pair $(G,H)$ defined by Adamson and Takasu to have coefficients in an $\Or(G)$-module. There is a canonical comparison homomorphism defined by Cisneros-Molina and Arciniega-Nevárez from Takasu's theory to Adamson's one. We give a necessary and sufficient condition on the subgroup $H$ for which the comparison homomorphism is an isomorphism for all coefficients. We also use the Lück-Wiermann construction to introduce a long exact sequence for Adamson (co)homology. Finally, we provide some examples of explicit computations for the comparison homomorphism.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.