Paper detail

Relative Chern characters for nilpotent ideals

If I is a nilpotent ideal in a $\mathbb{Q}$-algebra $A$, Goodwillie defined two isomorphisms from $K_*(A,I)$ to negative cyclic homology, $HN_*(A,I)$. One is the relative version of the absolute Chern character, and the other is defined using rational homotopy theory. The question of whether they agree was implicit in Goodwillie's 1986 Annals paper. In this paper, we show that the two isomorphisms agree. Here are three applications. 1.Cathelineau proved that the rational homotopy character is compatible with the $λ$-filtration. It follows that the relative Chern character is also compatible with this filtration for nilpotent ideals. 2.This agreement, together with Cathelineau's result, was used by the authors and Haesemeyer to show that the absolute Chern character, from $K(A)$ to $HN(A)$, is compatible with the $λ$-filtration for every commutative $\mathbb{Q}$-algebra. This is the main result of Infinitesimal cohomology and the Chern character to negative cyclic homology, arXiv:math/0703133v1. 3.This agreement can be used to strengthen Ginot's results in "Formules explicites pour le charactere de Chern en $K$-théorie algébrique", Ann. Inst. Fourier 54 (2004).

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.