Paper detail

Reinterpreting CTC training as iterative fitting

The connectionist temporal classification (CTC) enables end-to-end sequence learning by maximizing the probability of correctly recognizing sequences during training. The outputs of a CTC-trained model tend to form a series of spikes separated by strongly predicted blanks, know as the spiky problem. To figure out the reason for it, we reinterpret the CTC training process as an iterative fitting task that is based on frame-wise cross-entropy loss. It offers us an intuitive way to compare target probabilities with model outputs for each iteration, and explain how the model outputs gradually turns spiky. Inspired by it, we put forward two ways to modify the CTC training. The experiments demonstrate that our method can well solve the spiky problem and moreover, lead to faster convergence over various training settings. Beside this, the reinterpretation of CTC, as a brand new perspective, may be potentially useful in other situations. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/hzli-ucas/caffe/tree/ctc.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.