Paper detail

Reinforcing Semantic-Symmetry for Document Summarization

Document summarization condenses a long document into a short version with salient information and accurate semantic descriptions. The main issue is how to make the output summary semantically consistent with the input document. To reach this goal, recently, researchers have focused on supervised end-to-end hybrid approaches, which contain an extractor module and abstractor module. Among them, the extractor identifies the salient sentences from the input document, and the abstractor generates a summary from the salient sentences. This model successfully keeps the consistency between the generated summary and the reference summary via various strategies (e.g., reinforcement learning). There are two semantic gaps when training the hybrid model (one is between document and extracted sentences, and the other is between extracted sentences and summary). However, they are not explicitly considered in the existing methods, which usually results in a semantic bias of summary. To mitigate the above issue, in this paper, a new \textbf{r}einforcing s\textbf{e}mantic-\textbf{sy}mmetry learning \textbf{m}odel is proposed for document summarization (\textbf{ReSyM}). ReSyM introduces a semantic-consistency reward in the extractor to bridge the first gap. A semantic dual-reward is designed to bridge the second gap in the abstractor. The whole document summarization process is implemented via reinforcement learning with a hybrid reward mechanism (combining the above two rewards). Moreover, a comprehensive sentence representation learning method is presented to sufficiently capture the information from the original document. A series of experiments have been conducted on two wildly used benchmark datasets CNN/Daily Mail and BigPatent. The results have shown the superiority of ReSyM by comparing it with the state-of-the-art baselines in terms of various evaluation metrics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.