Paper detail

Reinforcement Learning Architectures: SAC, TAC, and ESAC

The trend is to implement intelligent agents capable of analyzing available information and utilize it efficiently. This work presents a number of reinforcement learning (RL) architectures; one of them is designed for intelligent agents. The proposed architectures are called selector-actor-critic (SAC), tuner-actor-critic (TAC), and estimator-selector-actor-critic (ESAC). These architectures are improved models of a well known architecture in RL called actor-critic (AC). In AC, an actor optimizes the used policy, while a critic estimates a value function and evaluate the optimized policy by the actor. SAC is an architecture equipped with an actor, a critic, and a selector. The selector determines the most promising action at the current state based on the last estimate from the critic. TAC consists of a tuner, a model-learner, an actor, and a critic. After receiving the approximated value of the current state-action pair from the critic and the learned model from the model-learner, the tuner uses the Bellman equation to tune the value of the current state-action pair. ESAC is proposed to implement intelligent agents based on two ideas, which are lookahead and intuition. Lookahead appears in estimating the values of the available actions at the next state, while the intuition appears in maximizing the probability of selecting the most promising action. The newly added elements are an underlying model learner, an estimator, and a selector. The model learner is used to approximate the underlying model. The estimator uses the approximated value function, the learned underlying model, and the Bellman equation to estimate the values of all actions at the next state. The selector is used to determine the most promising action at the next state, which will be used by the actor to optimize the used policy. Finally, the results show the superiority of ESAC compared with the other architectures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.