Paper detail

Regularization of an autoconvolution problem in ultrashort laser pulse characterization

An ill-posed inverse problem of autoconvolution type is investigated. This inverse problem occurs in nonlinear optics in the context of ultrashort laser pulse characterization. The novelty of the mathematical model consists in a physically required extension of the deautoconvolution problem beyond the classical case usually discussed in literature: (i) For measurements of ultrashort laser pulses with the self-diffraction SPIDER method, a stable approximate solution of an autocovolution equation with a complex-valued kernel function is needed. (ii) The considered scenario requires complex functions both, in the solution and the rhs of the integral equation. Since, however, noisy data are available not only for amplitude and phase functions of the rhs, but also for the amplitude of the solution, the stable approximate reconstruction of the associated smooth phase function represents the main goal of the paper. An iterative regularization approach is described that is specifically adapted to the physical situation in pulse characterization, using a non-standard stopping rule for the iteration process of computing regularized solutions. Our approach is illustrated by several case studies for synthetic noisy data and physically realistic complex-valued kernel functions. Based on an example with focus on amplitude perturbations, we show that the autoconvolution equation is locally ill-posed everywhere. To date, the analytical treatment of the impact of noisy data on phase perturbations remains an open question. However, we show its influence with the help of numerical experiments. Moreover, we formulate assertions on the non-uniqueness of the complex-valued autoconvolution problem, at least for the simplified case of a constant kernel. The presented results and figures associated with case studies illustrate the ill-posedness phenomena also for the case of non-trivial complex kernel functions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.