Paper detail

Regularization and the small-ball method II: complexity dependent error rates

For a convex class of functions $F$, a regularization functions $Ψ(\cdot)$ and given the random data $(X_i, Y_i)_{i=1}^N$, we study estimation properties of regularization procedures of the form \begin{equation*} \hat f \in {\rm argmin}_{f\in F}\Big(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N\big(Y_i-f(X_i)\big)^2+λΨ(f)\Big) \end{equation*} for some well chosen regularization parameter $λ$. We obtain bounds on the $L_2$ estimation error rate that depend on the complexity of the "true model" $F^*:=\{f\in F: Ψ(f)\leqΨ(f^*)\}$, where $f^*\in {\rm argmin}_{f\in F}\mathbb{E}(Y-f(X))^2$ and the $(X_i,Y_i)$'s are independent and distributed as $(X,Y)$. Our estimate holds under weak stochastic assumptions -- one of which being a small-ball condition satisfied by $F$ -- and for rather flexible choices of regularization functions $Ψ(\cdot)$. Moreover, the result holds in the learning theory framework: we do not assume any a-priori connection between the output $Y$ and the input $X$. As a proof of concept, we apply our general estimation bound to various choices of $Ψ$, for example, the $\ell_p$ and $S_p$-norms (for $p\geq1$), weak-$\ell_p$, atomic norms, max-norm and SLOPE. In many cases, the estimation rate almost coincides with the minimax rate in the class $F^*$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.