Paper detail

Regularity of the diffusion-dispersion tensor and error analysis of Galerkin FEMs for a porous media flow

We study Galerkin finite element methods for an incompressible miscible flow in porous media with the commonly-used Bear-Scheidegger diffusion-dispersion tensor $D({\bf u}) = Φd_m I + |{\bf u}| \big ( α_T I + (α_L - α_T) \frac{{\bf u} \otimes {\bf u}}{|{\bf u}|^2}\big)$. The traditional approach to optimal $L^\infty((0,T);L^2)$ error estimates is based on an elliptic Ritz projection, which usually requires the regularity of $\nabla_x\partial_tD({\bf u}(x,t)) \in L^p(Ω_T)$. However, the Bear-Scheidegger diffusion-dispersion tensor may not satisfy the regularity condition even for a smooth velocity field ${\bf u}$. A new approach is presented in this paper, in terms of a parabolic projection, which only requires the Lipschitz continuity of $D({\bf u})$. With the new approach, we establish optimal $L^p((0,T);L^q)$ error estimates and an almost optimal $L^\infty((0,T);L^\infty)$ error estimate.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.