Paper detail

Regotron: Regularizing the Tacotron2 architecture via monotonic alignment loss

Recent deep learning Text-to-Speech (TTS) systems have achieved impressive performance by generating speech close to human parity. However, they suffer from training stability issues as well as incorrect alignment of the intermediate acoustic representation with the input text sequence. In this work, we introduce Regotron, a regularized version of Tacotron2 which aims to alleviate the training issues and at the same time produce monotonic alignments. Our method augments the vanilla Tacotron2 objective function with an additional term, which penalizes non-monotonic alignments in the location-sensitive attention mechanism. By properly adjusting this regularization term we show that the loss curves become smoother, and at the same time Regotron consistently produces monotonic alignments in unseen examples even at an early stage (13\% of the total number of epochs) of its training process, whereas the fully converged Tacotron2 fails to do so. Moreover, our proposed regularization method has no additional computational overhead, while reducing common TTS mistakes and achieving slighlty improved speech naturalness according to subjective mean opinion scores (MOS) collected from 50 evaluators.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.