Paper detail

Regional Consistency: Programmability and Performance for Non-Cache-Coherent Systems

Parallel programmers face the often irreconcilable goals of programmability and performance. HPC systems use distributed memory for scalability, thereby sacrificing the programmability advantages of shared memory programming models. Furthermore, the rapid adoption of heterogeneous architectures, often with non-cache-coherent memory systems, has further increased the challenge of supporting shared memory programming models. Our primary objective is to define a memory consistency model that presents the familiar thread-based shared memory programming model, but allows good application performance on non-cache-coherent systems, including distributed memory clusters and accelerator-based systems. We propose regional consistency (RegC), a new consistency model that achieves this objective. Results on up to 256 processors for representative benchmarks demonstrate the potential of RegC in the context of our prototype distributed shared memory system.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.