Paper detail

Reflections, bendings, and pentagons

We study relations between reflections in (positive or negative) points in the complex hyperbolic plane. It is easy to see that the reflections in the points q_1,q_2 obtained from p_1,p_2 by moving p_1,p_2 along the geodesic generated by p_1,p_2 and keeping the (dis)tance between p_1,p_2 satisfy the bending relation R(q_2)R(q_1)=R(p_2)R(p_1). We show that a generic isometry F\in SU(2,1) is a product of 3 reflections, F=R(p_3)R(p_2)R(p_1), and describe all such decompositions: two decompositions are connected by finitely many bendings involving p_1,p_2/p_2,p_3 and geometrically equal decompositions differ by an isometry centralizing F. Any relation between reflections gives rise to a representation H_n->PU(2,1) of the hyperelliptic group H_n generated by r_1,...,r_n with the defining relations r_n...r_1=1, r_j^2=1. The theorem mentioned above is essential to the study of the Teichmuller space TH_n. We describe all nontrivial representations of H_5, called pentagons, and conjecture that they are faithful and discrete.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.