Paper detail

Reentrant Kondo effect in a quantum impurity coupled to a metal-semiconductor hybrid contact

Using NRG, we show that a system containing a quantum impurity (QI), strongly coupled to a semiconductor (gap $2 Δ$) and weakly coupled to a metal, displays a &#39;reentrant&#39; Kondo stage at low temperatures. The NRG analysis of the corresponding Single Impurity Anderson Model (SIAM) shows that the reentrant stage is characterized by a second sequence of SIAM fixed points: free orbital (FO) > local moment (LM) > strong coupling (SC). In the first stage, the SC fixed point (Kondo temperature $T_{K1}$) is unstable, while the second stage exhibits a much lower Kondo temperature $T_{K2}$, associated to a stable SC fixed point. The results indicate that the reentrant Kondo screening is associated to an effective SIAM, with an effective repulsion $U_{eff}$. This low temperature effective SIAM, which we dub as &#39;reentrant&#39; SIAM, behaves as a &#39;replica&#39; of the high temperature (bare) SIAM. The intuitive picture that emerges is that the first Kondo state develops through impurity screening by semiconducting electrons, while the second Kondo state involves screening by metallic electrons, once the semiconducting electrons are out of reach to thermal excitations ($T < Δ$) and only the metallic spectral weight inside the gap is available for impurity screening. In addition, we analyze a hybrid system formed by a QI `sandwiched&#39; between an armchair graphene nanoribbon (AGNR) and a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) tip, with respective couplings set to reproduce the generic model described above. The energy gap in the AGNR can be externally tuned by an electric-field-induced Rashba spin-orbit interaction. We analyzed this system for realistic parameter values, using NRG, and concluded that the reentrant SIAM, with its associated second stage Kondo, is worthy of experimental investigation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.