Paper detail

Reduction of the energy-gap scaling by coherent catalysis in models of quantum annealing

Non-stoquastic drivers are known to improve the performance of quantum annealing by reducing first-order phase transitions into second-order ones in several mean-field-type model systems. Nevertheless, statistical-mechanical analysis shows that some target Hamiltonians still exhibit unavoidable first-order transitions even with non-stoquastic drivers, making them difficult for quantum annealing to solve. Recently, a mechanism called coherent catalysis was proposed by Durkin [Phys. Rev. A \textbf{99}, 032315 (2019)], in which he showed the existence of a particular point on the line of first-order phase transitions where the energy gap scales polynomially as expected for a second-order transition. We show by extensive numerical computations that this phenomenon is observed in a few additional mean-field-type optimization problems where non-stoquastic drivers fail to change the order of phase transition in the thermodynamic limit. This opens up the possibility of using coherent catalysis to search for exponential speedups in systems previously thought to be exponentially slow for quantum annealing to solve.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.