Paper detail

Reducing Variance with Sample Allocation Based on Expected Response Rates

Several techniques exist to assess and reduce nonresponse bias, including propensity models, calibration methods, or post-stratification. These approaches can only be applied after the data collection, and assume reliable information regarding unit nonresponse patterns for the entire population. In this paper, we demonstrate that sample allocation taking into account the expected response rates (ERR) have advantages in this context. The performance of ERR allocation is assessed by comparing the variances of estimates obtained those arising from a classical allocation proportional to size (PS) and then applying post-stratification. The main theoretical tool is asymptotic calculations using the delta-method, and these are complemented with extensive simulations. The main finding is that the ERR allocation leads to lower variances than the PS allocation, when the response rates are correctly specified, and also under a wide range of conditions when the response rates can not be correctly specified in advance.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.