Paper detail

Reducing Maximum Weighted Matching to the Largest Cardinality Matching in CONGEST

In this paper, we reduce the maximum weighted matching problem to the largest cardinality matching in {\bf CONGEST}. The paper presents two technical contributions. The first of them is a simple $poly(\log n, \frac{1}{\varepsilon}, t, \ln w_t)$-round {\bf CONGEST} algorithm for reducing the maximum weighted matching problem to the largest cardinality matching problem. This is achieved under the assumption that all vertices know all edge-weights $\{w_1,....,w_t\}$ (in particular, they know $t$, the number of different edge-weights), though a particular vertex may not know the weight of a particular edge. Our second ingredient is a simple rounding algorithm (similar to approximation algorithms for the bin packing problem) allowing to reduce general instances of the maximum weighted matching problem to ones satisfying the assumptions of the first ingredient, in which $t\leq poly'(\log n, \frac{1}{\varepsilon})$. We end the paper with a brief discussion of implementing our algorithms in {\bf CONGEST}. Our main conclusion is that we just need constant rounds for the reduction.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.