Paper detail

Reducing Labelled Data Requirement for Pneumonia Segmentation using Image Augmentations

Deep learning semantic segmentation algorithms can localise abnormalities or opacities from chest radiographs. However, the task of collecting and annotating training data is expensive and requires expertise which remains a bottleneck for algorithm performance. We investigate the effect of image augmentations on reducing the requirement of labelled data in the semantic segmentation of chest X-rays for pneumonia detection. We train fully convolutional network models on subsets of different sizes from the total training data. We apply a different image augmentation while training each model and compare it to the baseline trained on the entire dataset without augmentations. We find that rotate and mixup are the best augmentations amongst rotate, mixup, translate, gamma and horizontal flip, wherein they reduce the labelled data requirement by 70% while performing comparably to the baseline in terms of AUC and mean IoU in our experiments.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.