Paper detail

Rectified Decision Trees: Exploring the Landscape of Interpretable and Effective Machine Learning

Interpretability and effectiveness are two essential and indispensable requirements for adopting machine learning methods in reality. In this paper, we propose a knowledge distillation based decision trees extension, dubbed rectified decision trees (ReDT), to explore the possibility of fulfilling those requirements simultaneously. Specifically, we extend the splitting criteria and the ending condition of the standard decision trees, which allows training with soft labels while preserving the deterministic splitting paths. We then train the ReDT based on the soft label distilled from a well-trained teacher model through a novel jackknife-based method. Accordingly, ReDT preserves the excellent interpretable nature of the decision trees while having a relatively good performance. The effectiveness of adopting soft labels instead of hard ones is also analyzed empirically and theoretically. Surprisingly, experiments indicate that the introduction of soft labels also reduces the model size compared with the standard decision trees from the aspect of the total nodes and rules, which is an unexpected gift from the `dark knowledge' distilled from the teacher model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.