Paper detail

Reconstructing Sparse Signals via Greedy Monte-Carlo Search

We propose a Monte-Carlo-based method for reconstructing sparse signals in the formulation of sparse linear regression in a high-dimensional setting. The basic idea of this algorithm is to explicitly select variables or covariates to represent a given data vector or responses and accept randomly generated updates of that selection if and only if the energy or cost function decreases. This algorithm is called the greedy Monte-Carlo (GMC) search algorithm. Its performance is examined via numerical experiments, which suggests that in the noiseless case, GMC can achieve perfect reconstruction in undersampling situations of a reasonable level: it can outperform the $\ell_1$ relaxation but does not reach the algorithmic limit of MC-based methods theoretically clarified by an earlier analysis. The necessary computational time is also examined and compared with that of an algorithm using simulated annealing. Additionally, experiments on the noisy case are conducted on synthetic datasets and on a real-world dataset, supporting the practicality of GMC.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.