Paper detail

Reconstructing missing seismic data using Deep Learning

In current seismic acquisition practice, there is an increasing drive for sparsely (in space) acquired data, often in irregular geometry. These surveys can trade off subsurface information for efficiency/cost - creating a problem of "missing seismic data" that can greatly hinder subsequent processing and interpretation. Reconstruction of regularly sampled dense data from highly sparse, irregular data can therefore aid in processing and interpretation of these far sparser, more efficient seismic surveys. Here, two methods are compared to solve the reconstruction problem in both space-time and wavenumber-frequency domain. This requires an operator that maps sparse to dense data: the operator is generally unknown, being the inverse of a known data sampling operator. As such, here the deterministic inversion is efficiently solved by least squares optimisation using a numerically efficient Python-based linear operator representation. An alternative approach is probabilistic and uses deep learning. Here, two deep learning architectures are benchmarked against each other and the deterministic approach; a Recurrent Inference Machine (RIM), which is designed specifically to solve inverse problems given known forward operators, and the well-known U-Net. The trained deep learning networks are capable of successfully mapping sparse to dense seismic data for a range of different datasets and decimation percentages, thereby significantly reducing spatial aliasing in the wavenumber-frequency domain. The deterministic inversion on the contrary, could not reconstruct the missing data and thus did not reduce the undesired spatial aliasing. Results show that the application of Deep Learning for seismic reconstruction is promising, but the treatment of large-volume, multi-component seismic datasets will require dedicated learning architectures not yet realisable with existing tools.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.