Researcher profile

Ivan Vasconcelos

Ivan Vasconcelos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Target-enclosing inversion using an interferometric objective function

Full waveform inversion is a high-resolution subsurface imaging technique, in which full seismic waveforms are used to infer subsurface physical properties. We present a novel, target-enclosing, full-waveform inversion framework based on an interferometric objective function. This objective function exploits the equivalence between the convolution and correlation representation formulas, using data from a closed boundary around the target area of interest. Because such equivalence is violated when the knowledge of the enclosed medium is incorrect, we propose to minimize the mismatch between the wavefields independently reconstructed by the two representation formulas. The proposed method requires only kinematic knowledge of the subsurface model, specifically the overburden for redatuming, and does not require prior knowledge of the model below the target area. In this sense it is truly local: sensitive only to the medium parameters within the chosen target, with no assumptions about the medium or scattering regime outside the target. We present the theoretical framework and derive the gradient of the new objective function via the adjoint-state method and apply it to a synthetic example with exactly redatumed wavefields. A comparison with FWI of surface data and target-oriented FWI based on the convolution representation theorem only shows the superiority of our method both in terms of the quality of target recovery and reduction in computational cost.

preprint2021arXiv

Reconstructing missing seismic data using Deep Learning

In current seismic acquisition practice, there is an increasing drive for sparsely (in space) acquired data, often in irregular geometry. These surveys can trade off subsurface information for efficiency/cost - creating a problem of "missing seismic data" that can greatly hinder subsequent processing and interpretation. Reconstruction of regularly sampled dense data from highly sparse, irregular data can therefore aid in processing and interpretation of these far sparser, more efficient seismic surveys. Here, two methods are compared to solve the reconstruction problem in both space-time and wavenumber-frequency domain. This requires an operator that maps sparse to dense data: the operator is generally unknown, being the inverse of a known data sampling operator. As such, here the deterministic inversion is efficiently solved by least squares optimisation using a numerically efficient Python-based linear operator representation. An alternative approach is probabilistic and uses deep learning. Here, two deep learning architectures are benchmarked against each other and the deterministic approach; a Recurrent Inference Machine (RIM), which is designed specifically to solve inverse problems given known forward operators, and the well-known U-Net. The trained deep learning networks are capable of successfully mapping sparse to dense seismic data for a range of different datasets and decimation percentages, thereby significantly reducing spatial aliasing in the wavenumber-frequency domain. The deterministic inversion on the contrary, could not reconstruct the missing data and thus did not reduce the undesired spatial aliasing. Results show that the application of Deep Learning for seismic reconstruction is promising, but the treatment of large-volume, multi-component seismic datasets will require dedicated learning architectures not yet realisable with existing tools.