Paper detail

Reconsidering the design of planar plasmonic lasers: gain, gap layers, and mode competition

Because surface plasmons can be confined below the diffraction limit, metallic lasers that support plasmonic modes can provide miniaturized sources of electromagnetic waves. Such devices often exploit a multilayer design, in which a semiconductor gain layer is placed near a metallic interface with a gap layer in between. However, despite many experimental demonstrations, key considerations for these planar metallic lasers remain understudied, leading to incorrect conclusions about the optimal design. Here, we pursue a detailed experimental and theoretical study of planar metallic lasers to explore the effect of design parameters on the lasing behavior. We print semiconductor nanoplatelets as a gain layer of controllable thickness onto alumina-coated silver films with integrated planar Fabry-Pérot cavities. Lasing behavior is then monitored with spectrally and polarization-resolved far-field imaging. The results are compared with a theoretical waveguide model and a detailed rate-equation model, which consider both plasmonic and photonic modes. We show that the nature of the lasing mode is dictated by the gain-layer thickness. Moreover, by explicitly treating gain in our waveguide model, we find that, contrary to conventional wisdom, a gap layer with high refractive index is advantageous for plasmonic lasing. Additionally, our rate-equation model reveals a regime where plasmonic and photonic modes compete within the same device, raising the possibility of facile, active mode switching. These findings provide guidance for future designs of metallic lasers and could lead to on-chip lasers with controlled photonic and plasmonic output, switchable at high speeds.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.