Paper detail

Reconfigurable Heterogeneous Parallel Island Models

Heterogeneous Parallel Island Models (HePIMs) run different bio-inspired algorithms (BAs) in their islands. From a variety of communication topologies and migration policies fine-tuned for homogeneous PIMs (HoPIMs), which run the same BA in all their islands, previous work introduced HePIMs that provided competitive quality solutions regarding the best-adapted BA in HoPIMs. This work goes a step forward, maintaining the population diversity provided by HePIMs, and increasing their flexibility, allowing BA reconfiguration on islands during execution: according to their performance, islands may substitute their BAs dynamically during the evolutionary process. Experiments with the introduced architectures (RecHePIMs) were applied to the NP-hard problem of sorting permutations by reversals, using four different BAs, namely, simple Genetic Algorithm, Double-point crossover Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution, and self-adjusting Particle Swarm Optimization. The results showed that the new reconfigurable heterogeneous models compute better quality solutions than the HePIMs closing the gap with the HoPIM running the best-adapted BA.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.