Paper detail

Reconciliation of Gene and Species Trees With Polytomies

Motivation: Millions of genes in the modern species belong to only thousands of `gene families'. A gene family includes instances of the same gene in different species (orthologs) and duplicate genes in the same species (paralogs). Genes are gained and lost during evolution. With advances in sequencing technology, researchers are able to investigate the important roles of gene duplications and losses in adaptive evolution. Because of gene complex evolution, ortholog identification is a basic but difficult task in comparative genomics. A key method for the task is to use an explicit model of the evolutionary history of the genes being studied, called the gene (family) tree. It compares the gene tree with the evolutionary history of the species in which the genes reside, called the species tree, using the procedure known as tree reconciliation. Reconciling binary gene and specific trees is simple. However, both gene and species trees may be non-binary in practice and thus tree reconciliation presents challenging problems. Here, non-binary gene and species tree reconciliation is studied in a binary refinement model. Results: The problem of reconciling arbitrary gene and species trees is proved NP-hard even for the duplication cost. We then present the first efficient method for reconciling a non-binary gene tree and a non-binary species tree. It attempts to find binary refinements of the given gene and species trees that minimize reconciliation cost. Our algorithms have been implemented into a software to support quick automated analysis of large data sets. Availability: The program, together with the source code, is available at its online server http://phylotoo.appspot.com.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.