BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Louxin Zhang

Louxin Zhang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Populations and EvolutionData Structures and Algorithmsmath.COComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceDiscrete MathematicsMolecular NetworksQuantitative Methods

Catalog footprint

What is connected

13works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Can Multiple Phylogenetic Trees Be Displayed in a Tree-Child Network Simultaneously?

A binary phylogenetic network on a taxon set $X$ is a rooted acyclic digraph in which the degree of each nonleaf node is three and its leaves (i.e.degree-one nodes) are uniquely labeled with the taxa of $X$. It is tree-child if each nonleaf node has at least one child of indegree one. A set of binary phylogenetic trees may or may not be simultaneously displayed in a binary tree-child network. Necessary conditions for multiple phylogenetic trees being simultaneously displayed in a tree-child network are given here. In particular, it is proved that any two phylogenetic trees can always simultaneously be displayed in some tree-child network on the same taxa set. It is also proved that any set of multiple binary phylogenetic trees can always simultaneously be displayed in some non-binary tree-child network on the same taxa set, where each nonleaf node is of either indegree one and outdegree two or indegree at least two and outdegree out.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Two Results about the Sackin and Colless Indices for Phylogenetic Trees and Their Shapes

The Sackin and Colless indices are two widely-used metrics for measuring the balance of trees and for testing evolutionary models in phylogenetics. This short paper contributes two results about the Sackin and Colless indices of trees. One result is the asymptotic analysis of the expected Sackin and Colless indices of a tree shape (which are full binary rooted unlabelled trees) under the uniform model where tree shapes are sampled with equal probability. Another is a short elementary proof of the closed formula for the expected Sackin index of phylogenetic trees (which are full binary rooted trees with leaves being labelled with taxa) under the uniform model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Sackin Index of Simplex Networks

A phylogenetic network is a simplex (or 1-component tree-child) network if the child of every reticulation node is a network leaf. Simplex networks are a superclass of phylogenetic trees and a subclass of tree-child networks. Generalizing the Sackin index to phylogenetic networks, we prove that the expected Sackin index of a random simplex network is asymptotically $Ω(n^{7/4})$ in the uniform model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Counting Tree-Child Networks and Their Subclasses

Galled trees are studied as a recombination model in population genetics. This class of phylogenetic networks is generalized into tree-child, galled and reticulation-visible network classes by relaxing a structural condition imposed on galled trees. We count tree-child networks through enumerating their component graphs. Explicit counting formulas are also given for galled trees through their relationship to ordered trees, phylogenetic networks with few reticulations and phylogenetic networks in which the child of each reticulation is a leaf.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Asymptotic Growth of the Number of Tree-Child Networks

In a recent paper, McDiarmid, Semple, and Welsh (2015) showed that the number of tree-child networks with $n$ leaves has the factor $n^{2n}$ in its main asymptotic growth term. In this paper, we improve this by completely identifying the main asymptotic growth term up to a constant. More precisely, we show that the number of tree-child networks with $n$ leaves grows like \[ Θ\left(n^{-2/3}e^{a_1(3n)^{1/3}}\left(\frac{12}{e^2}\right)^{n}n^{2n}\right), \] where $a_1=-2.338107410\cdots$ is the largest root of the Airy function of first kind. For the proof, we bijectively map the underlying graph-theoretical problem onto a problem on words. For the latter, we can find a recurrence to which a recent powerful asymptotic method of Elvey Price, Fang, and Wallner (2019) can be applied.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Locating a Phylogenetic Tree in a Reticulation-Visible Network in Quadratic Time

In phylogenetics, phylogenetic trees are rooted binary trees, whereas phylogenetic networks are rooted arbitrary acyclic digraphs. Edges are directed away from the root and leaves are uniquely labeled with taxa in phylogenetic networks. For the purpose of validating evolutionary models, biologists check whether or not a phylogenetic tree is contained in a phylogenetic network on the same taxa. This tree containment problem is known to be NP-complete. A phylogenetic network is reticulation-visible if every reticulation node separates the root of the network from some leaves. We answer an open problem by proving that the problem is solvable in quadratic time for reticulation-visible networks. The key tool used in our answer is a powerful decomposition theorem. It also allows us to design a linear-time algorithm for the cluster containment problem for networks of this type and to prove that every galled network with n leaves has 2(n-1) reticulation nodes at most.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Bounding the Size of a Network Defined By Visibility Property

Phylogenetic networks are mathematical structures for modeling and visualization of reticulation processes in the study of evolution. Galled networks, reticulation visible networks, nearly-stable networks and stable-child networks are the four classes of phylogenetic networks that are recently introduced to study the topological and algorithmic aspects of phylogenetic networks. We prove the following results. (1) A binary galled network with n leaves has at most 2(n-1) reticulation nodes. (2) A binary nearly-stable network with n leaves has at most 3(n-1) reticulation nodes. (3) A binary stable-child network with n leaves has at most 7(n-1) reticulation nodes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Locating a Tree in a Phylogenetic Network in Quadratic Time

A fundamental problem in the study of phylogenetic networks is to determine whether or not a given phylogenetic network contains a given phylogenetic tree. We develop a quadratic-time algorithm for this problem for binary nearly-stable phylogenetic networks. We also show that the number of reticulations in a reticulation visible or nearly stable phylogenetic network is bounded from above by a function linear in the number of taxa.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Locating a Tree in a Reticulation-Visible Network in Cubic Time

In this work, we answer an open problem in the study of phylogenetic networks. Phylogenetic trees are rooted binary trees in which all edges are directed away from the root, whereas phylogenetic networks are rooted acyclic digraphs. For the purpose of evolutionary model validation, biologists often want to know whether or not a phylogenetic tree is contained in a phylogenetic network. The tree containment problem is NP-complete even for very restricted classes of networks such as tree-sibling phylogenetic networks. We prove that this problem is solvable in cubic time for stable phylogenetic networks. A linear time algorithm is also presented for the cluster containment problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On Tree Based Phylogenetic Networks

A large class of phylogenetic networks can be obtained from trees by the addition of horizontal edges between the tree edges. These networks are called tree based networks. Reticulation-visible networks and child-sibling networks are all tree based. In this work, we present a simply necessary and sufficient condition for tree-based networks and prove that there is a universal tree based network for each set of species such that every phylogenetic tree on the same species is a base of this network. The existence of universal tree based network implies that for any given set of phylogenetic trees (resp. clusters) on the same species there exists a tree base network that display all of them.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Reconciliation of Gene and Species Trees With Polytomies

Motivation: Millions of genes in the modern species belong to only thousands of `gene families'. A gene family includes instances of the same gene in different species (orthologs) and duplicate genes in the same species (paralogs). Genes are gained and lost during evolution. With advances in sequencing technology, researchers are able to investigate the important roles of gene duplications and losses in adaptive evolution. Because of gene complex evolution, ortholog identification is a basic but difficult task in comparative genomics. A key method for the task is to use an explicit model of the evolutionary history of the genes being studied, called the gene (family) tree. It compares the gene tree with the evolutionary history of the species in which the genes reside, called the species tree, using the procedure known as tree reconciliation. Reconciling binary gene and specific trees is simple. However, both gene and species trees may be non-binary in practice and thus tree reconciliation presents challenging problems. Here, non-binary gene and species tree reconciliation is studied in a binary refinement model. Results: The problem of reconciling arbitrary gene and species trees is proved NP-hard even for the duplication cost. We then present the first efficient method for reconciling a non-binary gene tree and a non-binary species tree. It attempts to find binary refinements of the given gene and species trees that minimize reconciliation cost. Our algorithms have been implemented into a software to support quick automated analysis of large data sets. Availability: The program, together with the source code, is available at its online server http://phylotoo.appspot.com.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Reconstruction of Network Evolutionary History from Extant Network Topology and Duplication History

Genome-wide protein-protein interaction (PPI) data are readily available thanks to recent breakthroughs in biotechnology. However, PPI networks of extant organisms are only snapshots of the network evolution. How to infer the whole evolution history becomes a challenging problem in computational biology. In this paper, we present a likelihood-based approach to inferring network evolution history from the topology of PPI networks and the duplication relationship among the paralogs. Simulations show that our approach outperforms the existing ones in terms of the accuracy of reconstruction. Moreover, the growth parameters of several real PPI networks estimated by our method are more consistent with the ones predicted in literature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

From gene trees to species trees II: Species tree inference in the deep coalescence model

When gene copies are sampled from various species, the resulting gene tree might disagree with the containing species tree. The primary causes of gene tree and species tree discord include lineage sorting, horizontal gene transfer, and gene duplication and loss. Each of these events yields a different parsimony criterion for inferring the (containing) species tree from gene trees. With lineage sorting, species tree inference is to find the tree minimizing extra gene lineages that had to coexist along species lineages; with gene duplication, it becomes to find the tree minimizing gene duplications and/or losses. In this paper, we show the following results: (i) The deep coalescence cost is equal to the number of gene losses minus two times the gene duplication cost in the reconciliation of a uniquely leaf labeled gene tree and a species tree. The deep coalescence cost can be computed in linear time for any arbitrary gene tree and species tree. (ii) The deep coalescence cost is always no less than the gene duplication cost in the reconciliation of an arbitrary gene tree and a species tree. (iii) Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences is NP-hard.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access