Paper detail

Recommending Training Set Sizes for Classification

Based on a comprehensive study of 20 established data sets, we recommend training set sizes for any classification data set. We obtain our recommendations by systematically withholding training data and developing models through five different classification methods for each resulting training set. Based on these results, we construct accuracy confidence intervals for each training set size and fit the lower bounds to inverse power low learning curves. We also estimate a sufficient training set size (STSS) for each data set based on established convergence criteria. We compare STSS to the data sets' characteristics; based on identified trends, we recommend training set sizes between 3000 and 30000 data points, according to a data set's number of classes and number of features. Because obtaining and preparing training data has non-negligible costs that are proportional to data set size, these results afford the potential opportunity for substantial savings for predictive modeling efforts.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.