Paper detail

Reactivity Boundaries to Separate the Fate of a Chemical Reaction Associated with an Index-two saddle

Reactivity boundaries that divide the destination and the origin of trajectories are of crucial importance to reveal the mechanism of reactions. We investigate whether such reactivity boundaries can be extracted for higher index saddles in terms of a nonlinear canonical transformation successful for index-one saddles by using a model system with an index-two saddle. It is found that the true reactivity boundaries do not coincide with those extracted by the transformation taking into account a nonlinearity in the region of the saddle even for small perturbations, and the discrepancy is more pronounced for the less repulsive direction of the index-two saddle system. The present result indicates an importance of the global properties of the phase space to identify the reactivity boundaries, relevant to the question of what reactant and product are in phase space, for saddles with index more than one.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.