Paper detail

Re-thinking and Re-labeling LIDC-IDRI for Robust Pulmonary Cancer Prediction

The LIDC-IDRI database is the most popular benchmark for lung cancer prediction. However, with subjective assessment from radiologists, nodules in LIDC may have entirely different malignancy annotations from the pathological ground truth, introducing label assignment errors and subsequent supervision bias during training. The LIDC database thus requires more objective labels for learning-based cancer prediction. Based on an extra small dataset containing 180 nodules diagnosed by pathological examination, we propose to re-label LIDC data to mitigate the effect of original annotation bias verified on this robust benchmark. We demonstrate in this paper that providing new labels by similar nodule retrieval based on metric learning would be an effective re-labeling strategy. Training on these re-labeled LIDC nodules leads to improved model performance, which is enhanced when new labels of uncertain nodules are added. We further infer that re-labeling LIDC is current an expedient way for robust lung cancer prediction while building a large pathological-proven nodule database provides the long-term solution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.