Paper detail

Rational points near self-similar sets

In this paper, we consider a problem of counting rational points near self-similar sets. Let $n\geq 1$ be an integer. We shall show that for some self-similar measures on $\mathbb{R}^n$, the set of rational points $\mathbb{Q}^n$ is 'equidistributed' in a sense that will be introduced in this paper. This implies that an inhomogeneous Khinchine convergence type result can be proved for those measures. In particular, for $n=1$ and large enough integers $p,$ the above holds for the middle-$p$th Cantor measure, i.e. the natural Hausdorff measure on the set of numbers whose base $p$ expansions do not have digit $[(p-1)/2].$ Furthermore, we partially proved a conjecture of Bugeaud and Durand for the middle-$p$th Cantor set and this also answers a question posed by Levesley, Salp and Velani. Our method includes a fine analysis of the Fourier coefficients of self-similar measures together with an Erdős-Kahane type argument. We will also provide a numerical argument to show that $p>10^7$ is sufficient for the above conclusions. In fact, $p\geq 15$ is already enough for most of the above conclusions.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.